Is Freightliner part of Ford?

What is the difference between Freightliner evolution and Cascadia?
I drive the Cascadia because it's a bigger truck and has better features. The evolution is a little smaller
I also have a Freightliner and the Cascadia has better looks, but it has the same overall size. A Cascadia is more comfortable for me, but I don't like the "look" of it (more of a truck than a car). It seems like the Freightliner is heavier on the road compared to the Cascadia which makes it harder to get around town.not good.
Is the Freightliner easier on my back than the Cascadia? I will say one thing. When I bought the Cascadia, the first truck that I drove was a Freightliner. I had to put in the seats for the Freightliner and then they put me in the Cascadia after that. The driver seat adjustments in the Cascadia are very nice and the driver's seat in the Freightliner was a very tight fit (which I can live with).
The Freightliner has many more options and extras in general. There are 5 different dash panels for example. It's got leather on the dash (the Cascadia has not). The Freightliner comes with a built in microwave too! LOL.
The Cascadia has very nice leather, but the only option you can't live with is wood paneling for the cargo compartment. The Freightliner has cargo mats for the entire cab area and front of the bed to be wood/vinyl covered as an option. The Freightliner also has a DVD system which plays 3 movies one DVD.
Both truck are good trucks but the Cascadia has extra things for the driver too while the Freightliner goes overboard on driver comfort options, interior, seats, etc. What features do these trucks have? Is it worth the extra cost for the Freightliner? Both are good trucks.but not sure how you will prefer. For you the best option will be the one you will drive the most.
Both trucks have 4WD. You can easily run 1x3 gear in both trucks. I've been told that the Freightliner is better for climbing over rough areas, but I've never had a chance to test this myself. I believe it has better low speed steering control and more road holding ability over lower speeds.
Is Freightliner part of Ford?
In the wake of news that Freightliner is exiting trucks (as we reported last week), it is worth revisiting the relationship between Ford and Freightliner. I have often said that the best barometer of where the industry is going is to watch the relationship between the biggest companies. For example, while in the early days of the trucking business, International Harvester was the de facto leader in the industry, today it is a subsidiary of Navistar. That does not mean Navistar is the leader in the industry, just that it has successfully merged the two companies into one.
As for Freightliner, it also has a similar history to International Harvester. In the early days of the trucking industry, American Motor Transportation (AMT) was the dominant leader in the market. For most of the industry's history, AMT was a subsidiary of International Harvester. But as the industry went global, as the need for fleets became larger, as customers shifted to lower-cost services from airlines, AMT was spun off into its own company (freightliner). Today, freighthliner has grown into a larger company, but still, the company is a subsidiary of Ford. So with Freightliner as the "minority partner" in the merger between Ford and Volvo, who is the company that truly controls the industry?
In our article about the industry's future, we talked about how the largest carriers, the ones with the lowest costs, are likely to gain market share. And they are unlikely to do so in the form of acquisitions or mergers. Rather, we argued that a change in the way they do business will determine the future of the industry. Instead of purchasing fleets and buying chassis and engines, what if they are able to build their own fleets and buy new technology? With smaller companies making fleets, the companies with the capital would be those who are able to make their own capital.
It is hard to believe that the traditional big players are willing to be a minor part of this process. One is reminded of what C.L. "Lionel" Smithers said years ago in response to how the industry has changed in the past 20 years. "If you are not on top, you are on bottom," he once said.
What engine is in a Cascadia?

Does the VAF page have one?
I'm confused. We used to have one but it didn't work out, hence the current lack. You might want to join the Cascadia forum if you really want to dig into it. Also you might need a few friends that you can take to school with you, just so you can get an idea of how much a Cascadia can handle and how to do it properly.
The engines in the Cascadias are all of the M16D2 series. They can range from a 6KG to 10KG depending on the power settings, etc. They are single overhead cam pushrods with valves that open and close (more-or-less) by themselves, like on most Wankel engines. They also have a higher compression ratio than the 2.5L v8's to handle the extra power. In essence, the only major difference between a Cascadia and a Wankel is the pistons are square cut for easier casting.
They're not particularly fast cars but they run strong all day long. The torque from a 6KG car isn't even enough to be noticeable at any speed over 65mph, and the 8KG engines get pretty close to 50mph without a drop off in torque.
The Wankel works fine in the VAF. The only difference is the pistons are square cut rather than round, but I imagine the Cascadia could run with their OE valves if the parts were available.
I just think its strange that we do not have the Cascadian engine listed. It sounds like what I want.just needs to be built.
There are a few Cascadia's around. The more recent ones are much bigger and are very nice. I don't know about speed, but a friend has one on a trailer and will take it to a meet. There are several that can be seen at local meets. We used to run them at our club races, but I guess that has been shut down now. There are probably a few more where I am.
Is Freightliner Cascadia a good truck?
I've always had a soft spot for the Freightliner Cascadia, but my feelings were dampened when I heard from other truckers that the truck is not comfortable. I'm a hotel rat. I spend my life in hotels, and I can recognize comfort when I see it. The fact that many of the truckers I talked to have been complaining about the Cascadia does not bode well.
However, as a trucker, I don't think it's my place to tell people how they should operate. So I will make no judgment on the Cascadia until I've driven one.
I will be doing a lot of driving in California over the next month. Most of my driving will be during the day, so I don't think I will get a chance to take the time to explore every part of the truck. My first impression of the Cascadia will be during the night hours, when my attention will be focused on the road and not the amenities.
How much space do you need? I found it very interesting that someone complained about a lack of space on the Cascadia, while someone else complained that the space is more than sufficient. I think that this is a case where some drivers may not be experiencing the full utility of the Cascadia. I do agree that the bed of the Cascadia is very tight in the back. However, the seats are so comfortable that I feel almost as if I am driving the Cadillac of trucks. The problem is that the passenger seat is extremely close to the rear fenders, so it's hard for me to stretch out my legs.
The best compromise I found was a middle-of-the-road driver position, with the driver's seat tilted forward so the knees could stretch out. However, most people would find that positioning awkward, since it's not an easy task to sit down or get up while your knees are angled upward.
For me, the width of the front seats will be a problem when it comes time to pass on the highway. I rarely look at trucks while I'm driving, but every once in a while I get an opportunity to look over at someone's truck to see if they're doing something I want to emulate.
Leave Your Comments
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *