Does the Hurricane engine have problems?

Does the Hurricane engine have problems?

How good is the new Hurricane engine?

I bought a new engine for the old mtn bike. It was rebuilt and has a new frame. It was running but not very well so I spent alot of time over the winter getting it running better. As of late I had it rebuilt again but I noticed that the rear tire was getting lower than the front tire. I adjusted the valves to be at 3:1 ratio which the shop told me was correct and that was not it. So, I put a brand new rear tire on it last night and checked the pressure to be sure it was at the right level and it was all ok. The bike only has a 25 inch tire front and 25 rear and when I run my front tires hard it seems like the rear tire is slipping lower, and when I run the rear tires harder then the front tire is loosing pressure which can also cause the same problem. I am wondering if there is anything else that could be causing this? I checked the brakes, they are still good. Thanks for any info you have on this subject.

Not really, the rear tire just seems to slip lower than the front tire on that model. Yes, that is my concern. I thought it might be the brakes, but it has the same brakes as my old mtn bike and it was running real bad when I had them rebuilt, so I am thinking something else must be wrong. If I were to give you a full rundown of what happened then you could figure it out yourself? But its a long story.

It was running bad because it was built too lean, the valves weren't adjusted. It had a new rear tire put on a few weeks ago. The bike only has 25" front and 25" back tire. When I run the front tires hard, it gets a little lower than the rear tire. When I run the rear tires hard it's loosing pressure. It was rebuilt about 6 months ago and I had a lot of time working on it. I was only able to ride it about 20 miles a week and that was about 1 year ago. But, I really wanted to be able to ride the bike more and didn't want to run the front tire hard because I thought I would have to run it a lot if I didn't get it properly tuned, and then that would cause problems with the tire not being happy to go any farther than a little distance.

Does the Hurricane engine have problems?

I believe it was removed from the A-10 and put in a display somewhere, but it was on a "dirt bike" in a museum somewhere. I saw some pictures of a display where the engine was removed from a T-28 and a "T-28A", but could not identify the particular one. It was mounted on an old World War II tank with a large diameter round ball for the turret. The exhaust came out of a pipe that had a little "plume" coming off it.

The Hurricane was actually not too bad, although they did take quite a few hits over North Vietnam. However, the engine was prone to failing at high speeds due to lack of cooling (the Hurricane was designed for low-speed combat). For this reason, only around 25 were produced, although they served for decades. In the last year or so, the Army has been pushing the Hurricane off into storage.

I'm sure you will be able to tell me when I'm wrong, but I believe the Hurricane engine was a good design for a slow speed engine. The Air Force, in the late 50's was concerned about a possible Russian attack (although they didn't believe it was that likely). So the Air Force wanted a new fighter that would be faster than the F-100. So they built the F-100, and then they built a slightly modified version of the F-100, but using a modified version of the G-36 engine (the G-36B).

So the G-36B was a bit bigger, and used less moving parts, but was still very slow. So the F-104 was built using the G-36B.

It should be noted that the G-36B also had problems, and was plagued with failures during the early years of the F-104. However, the engine is a good design for what it does, although it does have problems when it comes to speed. The Hurricane is a really neat aircraft and I love watching movies about it and the Air Force as well. It was the first American jet fighter, and even though it was never really used in combat, it was a real inspiration for the F-15, F-16, F-117, etc. There was never anything like the Hurricane during WWII.

When I was a kid, I loved going to a field behind the big airport.

How many miles will the Hurricane engine last?

stellantis hurricane engine problems

I have a 1964 Hurricane motor with a Ford flathead in it. It was made in 1964 as well, and now my brother is going to pick it up to take to his shop. He said he has some knowledge about engines, and I am wondering how much trouble can this engine go through in its lifetime. I know they were made with the old carb, air cleaner and exhaust system. The only other difference is that it has a fan belt instead of a timing belt.

The original 350cid motor was rated at 150HP. My brother said he'll be able to make up to 80 HP by removing the headers and putting on a set of heads. He also said he's looking for a new bottom end, but he's not sure what to get.

When we moved the vehicle, the owner had a set of headers on it and just left them on. I have to clean up the back side where it will come up to the firewall, and then reinstall.

Will a set of stainless steel headers be much different than the original aluminum ones? They said aluminum is a good investment. Can anybody help me out on the best thing to put on it? Will it run properly with a set of heads and top end? I think the top end will be a breeze if you have a good set of heads. You should be able to bolt them on without having to buy anything new. Just remove the head bolts and tighten a new one into place. No welding needed.

If you haven't already checked it, it will be helpful to know how long the timing cover will take to replace. If the previous owner never changed it, you may have a big job ahead of you.

How reliable is the Stellantis Hurricane engine?

This question was asked by a few people in the other "Can Stellantis fly" thread. I personally think they are very reliable, as is the engine in the Stellantis ST20 and ST25. This is based on my own experience with my ST25. I've been flying this plane for some time now, and I can vouch that the motor has not failed once. There are some issues with the servos, like having 1-2 inches off axis of my wing chord, but you're probably familiar with that. Also, some trim problems with the trims, which is an electrical problem with the radio controls. So the main engine and gearbox have never failed on me.

Has anyone here flown a Stellantis for more than a year? Does it live up to its name and last forever like the Stelar says it does? That's a very good question. I have one that's less than a year old, as well.

Here are my first impressions about how reliable the Stellantis works. They seem to be good motors, but the gearbox has a problem and has needed replacing. In any case, if I wanted to fly it, I could buy a new gearbox pretty cheaply. A new Stellantis with the gearbox of which I'm referring to cost about a third of what the plane runs.

Stelantis also appears to be good with flying.

WMCW Admin

Reporting on news on topics such as used car industry prices, automobile recalls, site news and updates, opinion pieces about the used car market, and other appropriate automotive information.

Prev Post

Is there a free alternative to Carfax? Dec 11 2025

How many miles per gallon does a 2024 Ram 3500 diesel get? Dec 13 2025

Next Post